|
Example 2
Critique of "The Accident" by Jessica Thompson
(student writer)
(essay not provided because a good critique begins with a brief
summary which should be sufficient for a reader to understand the
critique.)
On a typical highway, on a typical sunny afternoon, Jessica
witnessed a very tragic automobile accident between an unsuspecting
truck driver and a very recently married couple. This provocative
narrative begins with a description of the setting and, suddenly
shifts to the inconsiderate and deadly antics of a careless driver
who caused this horrific accident. This immature drive created a
situation where the truck driver, though no fault of his own, ran
over the newly married couple's car causing death and heartache. It
concludes with a poignant message and reminder of what can happen
when driving is not taken seriously.
This narration begins with a very engaging introduction that sets
the stage for the terrible events that follow. Jessica begins with a
brief background to put the story into perspective. Because we have
all been in similar driving situations, this techniques works nicely
to draw the reader in and make it seem like an ordinary day. Then
through the generous use of sensory detail she paints a vivid
picture of the setting. The reader can almost smell the flowers and
feel relaxed on this a trip with friends. Unexpectedly, she
introduces a driver who seems to be tempting fate and not taking the
responsibility of driving seriously. She cleverly says,
"Suddenly, that same foolish blue
compact distracted my attention." At this point the introduction
ends, and I couldn't wait to see what happened. As introductions go,
this one was a great tease and made me eager to continue.
As I read I was treated to a
very coherent and well constructed narration. It begins with the
truck driving directly over this unfortunate car, and through the
use of dialogue and well supplied sensory details, I could
practically hear the crunching and sense the panic. She states, ""Back
away, it's going to blow." By using lots of transitional phrases,
the author, whisked me through the frantic events, and even let me
hear what she was thinking only this time through whispered personal
dialogue. From the smell of the smoke to the sounds of the crash not
much is left to the imagination. What also worked particularly well
was Jessica's use of Figurative Language. By comparing it to a
"volcano documentary" and showing us that when the truck exploded
"lava flowed" I could imagine the scene.
After all of this
mayhem, help gets to the scene, and we hear the chainsaw cutting
through the car to get to the woman trapped, but it is too late. At
this point, I was pretty nauseous, but Jessica was not done, and
wanted to make sure I understood what happened. She splashes
reality in my face, and simply states, " The rescue squad pulled out
a body bag. Into this cold dark bag was put whatever remained of
this poor woman." Through the use of dialogue, transition phrases,
and brilliant sensory detail, I felt as if I saw this accident and
wanted to find the driver of that blue compact car that cause all
this horror and have him brought to justice. After the smoke clears
and Jessica is calming me down from all the action, she saves
the worst for last and informs me that couple where just married and
on their way to their honeymoon in their bright shiny new car. I
think I cried.
At points the
author made inappropriate reference to the reader, using "You" which
I thought was not well thought out. After all, I was really
engrossed in this story, and I had good regard for the author's use
of language, This gaff was off-putting. Other than that, there were
a few other minor sentences errors, but nothing so egregious to take
away from my enjoyment and understanding of this tragedy
Example 2
Critique
of "Winning & Losing" by Jason Kapoor (student
writer)
(essay not provided because a good critique begins with a brief
summary which should be sufficient for a reader to understand the
critique.)
Kapoor begins this essay speaking about the skills children are
taught involving winning and losing. More specifically,
sportsmanship. According to Kapoor, sportsmanship is taught from a
young age. A parent is to teach their child sportsmanship by
playing with the child, losing, and then showing the child a good
example of how a loser behaves. Kappor goes on to say that as a
school aged child it is necessary to have sportsmanship skills. She
gives an example of school aged children demonstrating sportsmanship
by taking a knee when a member of the opposing team is hurt or
injured. Kapoor explains that there is a drastic decrease in the
presence of sportsmanship once the child, now a young adult, enters
high school and college. She claims that the act of taking a knee
when a member of the opposing team is injured, no longer takes
place. She concludes to say that if players behaved in a more
sportsmanship like manner, all people would find sporting
events more enjoyable.
Kapoor's introduction seemed as if there was a bit too much
information for an introduction. After reading the essay I could not
get a grasp of what exactly her thesis was. In Kapoor's essay,
there was very little use of transitional words which made it
diffcult to follow. There were a few instances where Kapoor's
sentences seemed as though they were missing a word. I believe it
would be possible for Kapoor to improve her writing by paying close
attention when proof reading or allowing someone else to proofread
for her. Sometimes it can be hard to find mistakes in one's own
work, because as the writer, one assumes what it should say and
believes that it does. Kapoor should also work more on unity. Within
each paragraph not all the supporting sentences seemed to go along
with what I assumed the main idea of the paragraph to be. Kapoor
used the rhetorical device of rhetorical questioning in her
conclusion. Her tone seemed to be subjective, opinionated, and
outspoken. She appropriately followed the rule for 3rd person. The
direction Kapoor took on the topic of sportsmanship was interesting.
Yet, unfortunately, due to my struggle in following this essay and
the confusion I felt over the purpose of Kapoor's conclusion, I did
not find this essay to be enjoyable.
Example 3
Critique of "Advertising" by Samantha Whitehall
(student writer)
(essay not provided because a good critique begins with a brief
summary which should be sufficient for a reader to understand the
critique.)
In this essay the author writes how product advertisements are
ruining today’s youth. He says that this is due to the fact that
advertising is a lie to get children to buy products. Many ads
depict children’s favorite celebrities using a specific product,
while in reality that celebrity would probably never even use the
product. The author goes on to say that many advertisements show
only the positive without telling the negative. Numerous ads depict
a product in use with the user have a good time without stating that
the product can potentially be a death hazard if used incorrectly.
The author also says that advertising sends the wrong message to
children regarding where and on what to spend their money. He
supports this statement by stating how advertisement tell children
to buy the product immediately before the product is gone, while in
two months the product will be half the price. The author ends his
essay by saying that companies do not evaluate their strategies of
selling products, since this simple method works, even though
sometimes it really is the worst possible method they could choose
from.
The introduction to this essay definitely has the grabber component
to it. The author starts off with the statement that product
advertisements are ruining the youth of today. It makes the reader
want to read on and see why and how advertisements are ruining the
youth of today. The author’s thesis is clearly stated in his
introduction. Upon reading the introduction the reader can
immediately know that the essay is about the way advertising today
is brainwashing children.
The author concludes
his essay in a way that wraps everything up very nicely. His
conclusion is written in a way that makes readers stop and think. He
brings out the point that companies will continue to pull the
children the way they want. This can make a reader stop and think of
a way to try to prevent this from happening.
The author’s
paragraphs are set up in a way that all have only one main idea,
which makes it easy for the reader to follow along. He has three
main ideas with three separate paragraphs that have supporting
sentences to support the main idea. Not all of the paragraphs have
concluding sentences, which makes the transition from one paragraph
to the next a little clumsy. All of the author’s paragraphs clearly
support the thesis that advertising today is brainwashing children.
This idea is very well developed throughout the essay.
The author’s order
of paragraphs is clear which enhances the meaning. He clearly breaks
down the various negative ways advertisements are ruining the youth.
The author’s order of support is clear within paragraphs. I like the
way he brings supporting examples. When the author says that
advertising companies are breaking into the minds of children in
showing a product in such a positive light that the negatives are
never explained, he brings excellent examples such as play-Doh and
Moon Sand.
The author uses the
rhetorical method of examples which is well chosen, very clear, and
supports meaning. I like the way he explains so clearly the way
advertising companies tell children they have to buy a certain
product before it’s gone, while if that child would wait a few more
months that product would be on sale for half the price. Most of the
author’s sentences are accurate and grammatically correct.
This
essay proved to be extremely interesting and thought-provoking. It
makes the reader stand back and reflect on the idiocies of
advertising.
|