RHETORICAL  METHODS\MODES
 

      Using the Rhetorical methods\modes is like putting together pieces of a puzzle: most major paragraphs use at least one mode, and most essays
      use  several modes. The modes are useful and necessary for writers to:

  • develop paragraphs

  • write essays

  • create longer papers in many subjects and disciplines in college

  • do research

  • write anything including person correspondence, reports, creative projects, etc...

     A rhetorical mode is a strategy, a method of presenting a subject. . Instructors have used rhetorical modes to teach writing or public speaking
     since ancient Greek times over two thousand years ago, perhaps longer.  Knowing the modes can help writers organize paragraphs and essays.
 

      Note

  • a paragraph usually has one Rhetorical mode\method

  • an essay usually has an overall Rhetorical mode\method, but each paragraph may have it own Rhetorical mode\method

  • any topic can be written about in several ways depending on your purpose for writing about it.

For Examples  Let's say I choose to write about a very simple topic:  a CUP of DUNKIN DONUTS COFFEE
   I can use of the following Rhetorical Modes\Methods depending on my purpose for picking this topic
Rhetorical Mode\Method  
Description  tell a reader how it looks, tastes, smells, sounds, mouth\belly feel,
Narration  tell a story about how a cup of this coffee comforted someone in a difficult specific situation
Example\Illustration  provide examples, concrete images  of my feelings about this cup of coffee
Classification-Division  put this beverage into a group of like beverages and explain exemplify their characteristics
Cause & Effect  write about the effect or cause of having this beverage handy when needed, how it effected something
Compare-Contrast  put it side by side Starbucks to show which is better and why
Process Analysis  write about how it is made, how it got to be so popular
Argumentation  try to convince a reader that it is the best coffee

 

 

Argumentation

            An "argument" is, simply, an educated guess or opinion, not a simple fact. It is something debatable: "Men have walked on the moon" is a fact, but "People will walk on Venus in the next ten years" is an opinion. Anything that reasonably can be debated is an argument. A simple argument paper usually presents a debatable opinion and then offers supports in favor of it, or sometimes an argument paper will discuss both sides of an issue and then give good reasons for choosing one side over the other.  For example, a paper about space flight might argue that humans should not spend large sums of money in sending people into space. The paper might then argue that three good reasons this is true is that there are many poor on our planet, on whom our resources should be spent, that space flight is not as enlightening for humankind as increasing literacy or cultural awareness, and that most of the money being spent on space is for military purposes, which is useless.  Another type of argument paper might ask the main idea as a question: "Should the human race spend large sums of money to send people into space?"  Then it might argue both sides thoroughly and, finally, choose one side and give strong reasons why this side is best.

            A typical argument paper often has what is called a "thesis" structure.  It starts with an introduction that offers an interesting opening--a quotation, perhaps, or an interesting story, a statement of the main argument, and sometimes a list of the several reasons (often three, but not necessarily so) to be given in support of this argument.  Then, step by step, the reasons are given with supporting details such as quotations, facts, figures, statistics, and/or people's experiences.  If the paper is short, there may be just one paragraph per reason.  In a longer argument paper, there may be several paragraphs or even several pages per reason.  At the end, a conclusion provides a restatement of the main argument and a final interesting quotation or other detail.

        In the alternative form, the introduction is much the same, and often starts with an interesting quotation or story, but it offers the main idea as a question and provides the two (or more) possible answers.  It may or may not state which answer it will choose in the end.  The body is formed by having a section discussing the first possible answer with reasons and details supporting it, the second possible answer and its reasons and supporting details, and a final section in which you choose one of the two answers and give strong reasons why you are doing so.  The conclusion once again restates your final choice and offers a final interesting quotation or story.

            As with all the other modes, argumentation is a thinking pattern or skill that is used in a number of types of college papers in shorter form.  You will find it in any sentence, paragraph, or section of a paper in which an opinion is expressed, especially when one or more supporting reasons are given for the opinion.  Argumentation is one of the most basic forms of human thinking.  When you use argument, you rise above the mere offering of a personal opinion precisely because an argument requires supporting reasons, preferably with specific supporting details, to justify the position you are taking.

Purpose
To convince a reader that your side of a debatable issue is the better one

Return to top.

Cause & Effect

Paragraph
Usually illustrates what caused something or the effect of something. Most likely one paragraph will only deal with one cause or one effect.
example: What caused me to buy my cup of Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee OR the effect it had after I drank it.       

Longer writing

 "Cause and effect" simply means that you start with a subject (an event, person, or object) and then show the causes (reasons) for it, and/or the effects (results) of it.  Note: In an essay you will address either the Cause OR the Effect - Do not do both.

"Cause" means the reasons why or for something, or the source of something. "Effects" simply are results or outcomes. Cause-and-effect writing shows a chain of connected events, each the logical result of the one before it. A simple cause-and-effect paper discusses the chain of events related to a person, event, or object, showing what are the causes and what are the results.  For example, a paper about a solar car might describe how it came to be built by an inventor and how he first became interested in solar cars (the causes), and what the results of this solar car might be--how its existence might lead people to take energy efficiency and environmental concerns more seriously and even lead to mass-produced solar cars (effects or results).

            Typically a cause-and-effect paper has an introductory paragraph defining or clarifying the subject itself, and stating the nature of the paper (i.e., that your paper is a cause-and-effect paper); a body of several to many paragraphs; and a brief concluding paragraph.  Assume, when you write a cause-and-effect paper, that you are explaining events to someone who may know a little about them but never has heard the entire story of how the events are linked by logical cause and effect.  

            At the end of your cause-and-effect paper, add a final, concluding paragraph.  It should summarize, very briefly, the most important cause and effect concerning your subject.  And it might offer a final interesting thought or two about the subject. 

            It also is possible to use cause and effect in less than a full paper.  In fact, many explanations and discussions involve cause-and-effect logic in just a paragraph or two, just a sentence, or even within a phrase within a sentence.  Anytime you want to answer the question of why something has happened, you are using cause-and-effect logic.

For more info see: cause\effect

Return to top.

                   

Classification

Paragraph
Putting a topic in a group and making class distinctions.
example: classifying my
Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee into different types of beverages.

Longer Writing

"Classification" means that a subject--a person, place, event, or object--is identified and broken into parts and sub-parts. This type of paper is slightly more complex than others.  For this reason, you might first want to learn to write "Extended Definition," "Comparison/Contrast," and "Description" papers.  

            For an example of a classification paper, imagine you want to classify a specific student.  You might first start by identifying this student by name and briefly defining him or her.  Second, you would choose a system by which to classify him: e.g., you could choose a system that would describe his looks, school classes, and after-school activities; or you might choose a biological system and describe him by his physical type, health, blood type, and other biological markings; or, perhaps, you might choose to describe the student by his psychological makeup, his family history, and/or even his medical history.  Third, once you have chosen a system, you would then describe the person.  As you do so, you would want to show how, in each part of our classification, he is similar to others like him and also how he differs from them--this is the heart of developing lengthy description in a good classification paper, to use comparisons and contrasts with each small element of our classification system.     

            A standard classification paper starts with a short introduction.  In it, you state and briefly define (see "Extended Definition") your subject.  You also should state clearly that you intend to classify your subject.  In the body of your paper, you describe your subject according to the classification system you have chosen.  You choose a system based partly on what your audience expects (e.g., a psychology instructor probably would expect you to classify and describe using a system of psychology; a biology instructor, a system of biology; etc.) and partly on how many classification categories you need to make your paper be well developed (often, the more categories you have, the more length you can develop).  Be sure to break down the body into a number of separate paragraphs.  Finally, your conclusion briefly reminds your audience of the subject and purpose and, perhaps, ends with a final, interesting sentence or two.

            Classification is used as a pattern of thinking, speaking, and writing in shorter forms, too.  Whenever you must break down a subject into its separate parts, you are classifying.  Classification is almost as basic a way of thinking as are "Cause and Effect" (above) and "Description" (below).

Return to top.

         

Compare\Contrast

Paragraph
Putting two like subjects side by side, showing similarities and differences. (to make a choice or show how the two work better together)
example: Putting Starbucks and my
Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee side by side to show why I prefer Dnkin Donuts Coffee.
 

 Longer Writing

    "Compare/contrast" means to show how subjects are alike and/or different. A simple comparison/contrast paper often has two subjects and describes how they are alike and then how they differ. For example, a comparison/contrast paper on two forms of weekend entertainment, camping and dancing, might first give details on how both can involve physical skills, friends, and enjoying sounds and sights; then the paper might give details of how camping and popular dancing differ in that one happens in nature and the other in the midst of civilization, one usually is slow and quiet and the other often fast and loud, and one peaceful while the other is rousing. If you are asked to write a comparison/contrast paper on just one subject, you can first compare it to the subjects it is like and then contrast it to the subjects that seem opposite it; several different similarities and several different opposites are acceptable, even helpful, in such a paper.  For example, if you were going to write a comparison/contrast paper about airports, you might decide compare them to city bus stations, train stations, and street bus stops.  Then you might contrast them with each of these.

            In academic writing, comparison/contrast writing sometimes is used to show how two related viewpoints--two ideas or opinions--can be similar but different: for example, in the abortion controversy, some people believe that abortions are wrong; others believe that artificial birth control is wrong. These two positions are similar, but they also are different--leading to different arguments and different results at times.  Comparison/contrast also can be useful in analyzing an author's argument by comparing it to someone else's argument (yours or another author's), showing points of similarity and points of difference. For example, if an author argues for a constitutional amendment preventing gender discrimination, you could analyze the argument by comparing and contrasting it to the reasons for other constitutional amendments which already exist.

            Start a comparison/contrast paper simply and clearly: tell your readers in a brief introduction what you are going to do (compare, contrast, or both) and what your subject or subjects are.  It also may be helpful to offer a very brief definition (see "Extended Definition") of your subject(s).  Then write the body.  It is a good idea to provide at least one paragraph for each intellectual function you are going to do.  For example, you might first have just one paragraph (or one set of paragraphs) that use comparison, then another set that uses just contrast.  Instead, you might organize our paragraphs by subject: using the example above of airports, you might have one paragraph or set of paragraphs comparing and contrasting them to city bus stations, a second set comparing and contrasting them to train stations, and a final set to street bus stops.  The organization you choose for your body paragraphs should be the one that helps your readers most easily understand your comparisons/contrasts.  Your conclusion should be one paragraph containing a summary of your subject and purpose (to compare and/or contrast), and a final interesting sentence or two.  The audience you should consider as you plan and then write your paper is anyone who knows all of the subjects you are talking about but who would find it interesting to read about how they are compared/contrasted.  

            Comparison and contrast both are commonly used in short form in many other types of papers, too.  For example, you must use comparison and contrast to define something (see "Extended Definition": you show what the subject is like; then you show how it differs or contrasts from others like it).  You also use comparison anytime you explain that something is "like" something else; likewise, you use contrast whenever you want to show how something is different.  Comparison/contrast is quite deeply and naturally imbedded in our everyday thinking and logic.

Return to top.

                

Description

Paragraph
To draw a picture of your topic.
example:  I could show you how my
Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee tastes, smells, looks, feels, sounds.

Longer Writing         

 "Description" means "illustrative detail." A description paper often takes a person or object and then describes that person or thing in great illustrative detail.  For example, a description paper about a close friend might describe his or her appearance, her actions, and her personality, both through direct descriptive words--like paintings of her in different situations--and through stories or vignettes showing him in action.  It is important to e thorough--to provide plenty of details.  Often it is helpful to use one or more plans or systems of description.  One typical plan is to move in a specific direction: e.g., from head to foot when describing a person, or perhaps clockwise when describing a room or place.  The exact direction or order does not matter as long as you are consistent.  Another system is to use the five senses to describe; still another, is to use the five W's of journalism by answering the questions "Who, What, Where, When, and Why or How?" When you describe a subject that moves--a person or moving object--it is wise to describe not only its appearance when standing still, but also its movement.  In fact, whenever you write a description paper, it is wise to include as much action as possible: to make your readers see a movie whenever possible, and not just a painting or drawing.  

            A description paper is organized very simply.  You can start with a very short paragraph introducing or defining the subject, or a longer one that offers a particularly striking first description or overall summary.  Next, you can write the body in as many or as few paragraphs as you need to fully describe the subject.  Organizing these paragraphs according to one or more plans or systems often is helpful.  Finally, you can write a concluding paragraph either briefly or at length, depending on whether you want to achieve an abrupt end or to provide some kind of especially strong final description that you have saved for the last.

            This rhetorical mode is very common in shorter form, as well.  When someone writes a story, for example, whether he or she is a famous story writer or a simple school child, he will use two main rhetorical modes: narration (the giving of a series of events, as above) and description. Even business reports must sometimes use description to provide an accurate and full account of the appearance of something.  Description plays an especially important part in the teaching of writing, as writing instructors usually want their students to learn to write in great detail--the more specifics, the better.

Return to top.

    

Example-Illustration

  Paragraph
To illustrate with concrete examples to support and abstract thought.    
examples: I could show you several examples of when my
Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee really comforted me or acted like my friend.   

Longer Writing

 "Exemplification" means "the giving of an example." An exemplification paper usually starts with a main idea, belief, or opinion--something abstract--and then gives one extended example or a series of shorter examples to illustrate that main idea. In fact, an exemplification paper is a paper that illustrates an abstract idea. For example, if I wished to write an exemplification paper about "The Opposite Sex--Problems and Pleasures" (as a man or as a woman), there might be two ways I could go about this. One would be, after introducing my general idea, to tell several little stories about--give examples of--how the opposite sex can be both a problem to deal with and a pleasure to be with. The other way I might write the paper (and a stronger, more unified way of doing it) might be to pick out one person of the opposite gender I have dated or lived with and describe how this one person gave me both problems and pleasures in my overall relationship with him or her.

            A typical short exemplification paper is written like most of the other rhetorical-modes paper.  It usually starts with a single introductory paragraph that briefly defines your subject and states what you will do in the paper--exemplify. Then there are one or two to many paragraphs offering one or more extended examples of your subject.  Finally, there is a brief closing paragraph restating what your subject is and offering some kind of final brief, strong example or some other kind of interesting ending.  Your audience is anyone who might only have a partial understanding of the subject and to whom an example would be helpful: in fact, you choose your examples partly by deciding what the audience will easily understand.

            Shorter versions of this rhetorical mode exist, as do the others, within the space of a few paragraphs, one paragraph, or even as part of a larger paragraph.  Exemplification simply means to give an example of a subject, and it is possible to do this in as little as a sentence.

 

Return to top.

                

Narration

Paragraph
Tell a story
example: I could tell a story of drinking my
my Cup of Dunkin Donuts Coffee

Longer Writing

  "Narration" or a "narrative" provides details of what happened.  It is almost like a list of events in the order that they happened, except that it is written in paragraph form.  A narration or narrative doesn't have to show any cause and effect; it only needs to show what happened in the order that it happened.  History books are filled with narrations. For example, if I were to describe the visit of the Pope to Denver in 1993, I would use his itinerary and give details of each major event in that visit. If I were writing a book about it, I would give details of many of the more interesting minor events as well. I would do this in the order in which they occurred: first the Pope did this, then he did that, and then he did a third thing.

            A typical short narration paper starts with a brief introductory paragraph consisting of two parts.  The first is a sentence or two stating the event you are going to narrate; you might even want to include the who, what, where, and when of the event in this part.  The second part is a simple statement that the paper you are writing is a narrative of this event.  In the body of the narrative, you break the event into several parts--one part per paragraph.  Each paragraph would then further break down the event into sub-events and enough description of them that your reader will know what you mean.  The body may have just a few paragraphs or many, depending on the length of paper and complexity you want.  The conclusion can be very brief: just a final rewording of the overall event you have narrated, and a final interesting comment or two about it, or perhaps a statement about how, where, or when this event fits into the larger flow of history around it.  Your audience is anyone who knows little or nothing about the event but can understand it easily once you explain it.

            As with other rhetorical modes, narration often is used in a context shorter than an entire paper.  More commonly, you may need to explain a sequence of events, event by event, in just a paragraph or two when you are writing a longer paper for some other purpose: if you need to give a long example of one or two paragraphs, this example might, perhaps, be in story form--in the order in which events happened.  This would be a short narration.  Any other time as well that you write about events in the order in which they happened, you are using narration.

 

Return to top.

  

Process Analysis

There are 2 types of Process Analysis writing.

* "How It Happened" process analysis answers the question: “How?” Process analysis explains how the sequential steps of a procedure lead to its accomplishment; or, how a certain series of events occurred. There are two kinds of process analysis: directional and informational.

* "Directional\Prescriptive" process analysis asks: How do you do it? This kind of analysis examines how to do something in such a way that a process may be repeated. The analysis provides directions, as in the Methods section of a laboratory report, or
prescribes a certain process to follow.

Informational, or descriptive, process analysis asks: How does it work or occur? How is it done? This kind of analysis explains how something is, or was, accomplished. The analysis provides information, as in the outline of an organic process, or describes how
(not why) certain events led to a particular outcome.

Why? What is the purpose?

The purpose is to explain how to do something or how something works or occurs in order to argue for the effectiveness of a proposed process or to discuss the significance or value of a process

When is a process analysis required?

Directional process analysis is usually required as part of the Methodology section of lab reports and studies. It may also be required in certain proposals. Informational process analysis is often required in analytical essays that examine how a process
works. Here are some examples of university assignments requiring process analysis:

Management: Write a proposal for a training program for upgrading employee communication skills.
Biology: Conduct a study to determine the seasonal growth rates of transplanted deciduous trees. Political Science/International Development Studies: How can non-governmental organizations assist in the United Nations’ distribution of emergency aid in cases of disaster relief?
Psychology: Plan a treatment program for autistic youth. History: Analyze the negotiation process that led to the Warsaw Pact.
Anthropology: Compare the grooming rituals of captive and wild orangutans.

As you may notice from these examples, process analysis is often a part of other kinds of analysis, such as comparison/contrast and cause and effect.

How? What is the technique?

Think the whole process through carefully. Make sure you haven’t forgotten any steps, events or phases. The most common error made in process analysis is mixing up the order of a process or forgetting a crucial part. Make sure you include the preparation required, e.g. preparing handouts and slides for a proposed training program. Write down an outline of all the steps or phases involved in chronological order (from first to last). Make sure the sequence is correct and that nothing has been left out. For an involved process, group smaller steps together into larger categories or
create sub-categories. For example, an analysis of the stages of early childhood development might first be divided into the ages of the child (0-1 month) then into sub-categories based on areas of development (Emotional). When giving directions for a process to follow, make sure you include necessary precautions when appropriate, and the reasons for these. For example, the methodology for a study on the effect of cardiovascular exercise on smokers might include a precaution of screening potential study subjects for pre-existing heart conditions prior to acceptance to prevent injury or death of subjects during the study. If appropriate, use your critical thinking skills to analyze the whole picture of the process, asking questions such as: “Is this process effective? What is the significance or relevance of this process? What is its value? What does it mean?
What are the implications?” Define technical terms that the reader might not know, e.g. “behaviour modification.”
Use time-marking transitions in your draft to make the order of the steps clear: “first,” “next,” “then,” “after,” “finally.” Also use transitions to distinguish sub-steps from major steps. Write in short, direct, declarative sentences. Illustrate steps with examples. Narrate
the steps in order. Describe what is involved in each step or phase as clearly as possible. Revise your draft carefully. This is one of the most difficult kinds of analysis to write clearly. Have someone read it to ensure clarity.

TRANSITIONS USED IN PROCESS ANALYSIS
MAJOR STEPS/STAGES SUB-STEPS/STAGES SUB-STEPS/STAGES
First (begin) before then
second during later
third after when
fourth next as soon as
fifth while prior
finally meanwhile subsequently
           
Return to top.